S. 4453

S. 4453: A bill to require the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of the Interior to ensure that the information technology and cybersecurity and information security systems of the Department of Agriculture and the Department of the Interior are

Introduced Adam Schiff (D) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

S. 4453 is a bill that mandates the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of the Interior to ensure that the information technology, cybersecurity, and information security systems within their respective departments are adequately maintained and secured. This likely involves updating systems, implementing new security measures, and ensuring that sensitive information is protected against cyber threats.

Positive Media Summary

Media coverage has highlighted the importance of this legislation in enhancing the cybersecurity framework of two critical government departments. Supporters argue that bolstering IT and cybersecurity measures is essential for protecting sensitive agricultural and environmental data, which can have significant implications for national security and public trust.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of S. 4453 have raised concerns about the potential costs associated with implementing the required security upgrades. Some argue that the bill may divert funds from other important programs within the Departments of Agriculture and the Interior, potentially impacting services and initiatives that benefit the public.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Agriculture and Food

The analysis of bill S. 4453, which focuses on enhancing the information technology and cybersecurity systems of the Departments of Agriculture and the Interior, reveals no direct industry overlaps with the sponsor Adam Schiff's top donor industries. The lobbying activity in this policy area includes contributions from various organizations, such as BAMCO LLC with $110,000 and the Transportation Communications National Union/IAM with $70,000. However, these contributions do not indicate a direct conflict with the bill's subject matter, as they pertain to different sectors. The absence of direct industry connections suggests that there is minimal risk of conflicts of interest arising from the sponsor's financial backers in relation to this legislation.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
BAMCO LLC CHECKMATE GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $110,000
TRANSPORTATION COMMUNICATIONS NATIONAL UNION/IAM (FKA TRANSPORTATION COMMUNICATI TRANSPORTATION COMMUNICATIONS NATIONAL UNION/IAM (FKA TRANSPORTATION COMMUNICATI $70,000
MCCORMICK & COMPANY, INCORPORATED MCCORMICK & COMPANY, INCORPORATED $20,000
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS HARO SOLUTIONS LLC $10,000
INTERCOMP COMPANY BROMELKAMP GOVERNMENT RELATIONS, LLC $10,000
CONSUMER BANKERS ASSOCIATION 1607 STRATEGIES, LLC $10,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR GIFTED CHILDREN JENNIFER MADSEN undisclosed
AMERICAN COMMERCIAL BARGE LINE LLC AMERICAN COMMERCIAL BARGE LINES, LLC undisclosed
GALVANIZE THERAPEUTICS, INC. JEFFREY J. KIMBELL & ASSOCIATES, INC. undisclosed
NEURALINK CORP. JEFFREY J. KIMBELL & ASSOCIATES, INC. undisclosed
CAPITOL COUNSEL LLC ON BEHALF OF SKYVAULT AI LLC MICHAEL J. LAMOUREUX undisclosed
PRECISION IMPACTS, LLC THORN RUN PARTNERS undisclosed
CITY OF FREDERICK OKLAHOMA BROMELKAMP GOVERNMENT RELATIONS, LLC undisclosed
TWINLOGIC STRATEGIES ON BEHALF OF PEW CHARITABLE TRUSTS WINN STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
MONUMENT HILLS PARTNERS, LLC THE BERNHARDT GROUP LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Adam Schiff, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us