Provides that a claimant eligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits shall also be entitled to receive a dependent allowance which shall begin at forty-five dollars and shall increase annually by an amount determined by the department of labor; directs the department of labor to report to the legislature following each calendar quarter certain information about dependent allowances and to make such reports available on its website; provides that a claimant's maximum benefit amount, including such dependent allowance, shall not exceed one hundred percent of such claimant's average weekly wage from their highest-earning calendar quarter.

New York Senate Bill S09382, introduced on March 6, 2026, proposes that individuals eligible for unemployment insurance benefits receive an additional dependent allowance of $45 per dependent per week. This allowance would increase annually by an amount determined by the Department of Labor. The bill also mandates that the Department of Labor report quarterly to the legislature on dependent allowances and make these reports available on its website. Furthermore, the claimant's total benefit amount, including the dependent allowance, would be capped at 100% of their average weekly wage from their highest-earning calendar quarter. ([legiscan.com](https://legiscan.com/NY/bill/S09382/2025?utm_source=openai))

NY S09382 is a senate bill in the New York 2025-2026 General Assembly, sponsored by Robert Jackson (D), currently “Introduced” since March 6, 2026.

We track 14,823 New York bills this session, 193 of them sponsored by Robert Jackson.

While specific media coverage for Senate Bill S09382 is not readily available, the proposal to provide additional support to unemployed individuals with dependents is likely to be viewed favorably by advocacy groups focused on economic assistance and family welfare. Such organizations may commend the bill for addressing the financial challenges faced by families during unemployment.

Conversely, some media outlets and policymakers might express concerns about the financial implications of the bill. Critics could argue that the proposed dependent allowance may place additional strain on the state's unemployment insurance fund, potentially leading to increased taxes or reduced benefits for other claimants. There may also be debates about the fairness of capping total benefits at 100% of a claimant's average weekly wage, with some questioning whether this adequately supports families with higher living expenses.