H.J.Res. 170

H.J.Res. 170: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to “The Fair Credit Reporting Act’s

Introduced Maxine Waters (D) HOUSE_JOINT_RESOLUTION — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.J.Res. 170 is a joint resolution that seeks to disapprove a rule from the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (CFPB) regarding the withdrawal of a regulation connected to the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Essentially, if passed, this resolution would prevent the CFPB from withdrawing the existing rule that governs aspects of credit reporting.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.J.Res. 170 argue that maintaining the existing rule is crucial for consumer protection, ensuring that individuals have fair access to credit and that their credit information is reported accurately. Advocates highlight that disapproving the withdrawal helps to uphold consumer rights and promotes transparency in credit reporting.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.J.Res. 170 claim that the resolution undermines the CFPB's ability to adapt regulations to better reflect current market conditions. They express concern that maintaining outdated rules could hinder innovation in the financial sector and may not adequately protect consumers in the evolving landscape of credit reporting.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Finance and Financial Sector

There is no direct overlap between the sponsor's top donor industries and the subject matter of the bill, which reduces the risk of potential conflicts of interest. However, there is lobbying activity in the bill's policy area. Notably, the Healthy Markets Association and the American Association for Justice have spent $10,000 and $25,000 respectively. The source of these funds is not directly linked to the sponsor's top donors, which further reduces the risk of a conflict of interest. It's important for voters to be aware that while lobbying activity can influence legislation, in this case, there is no clear link between the sponsor's donors and the lobbyists.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
MARVELL TECHNOLOGY, INC. CLARK STREET ASSOCIATES $30,000
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE LXR GROUP $25,000
BMWED/BRS/SMART-MD/PASSENGER RAIL/NCFOBJ MOONEY, GREEN, SAINDON, MURPHY & WELCH, P.C. $16,000
YELLOWSTONE TO YUKON CONSERVATION INITIATIVE MICHAEL POWELSON $11,000
HEALTHY MARKETS ASSOCIATION LXR GROUP $10,000
UNIAO DA INDUSTRIA DE CANA-DE-AUCAR E BIOENERGIA (UNICA) BARRAL M JORGE CONSULTORES ASSOCIADOS LTDA $10,000
CONFEDERACAO NACIONAL DAS INSTITUICOES FINANCEIRAS BARRAL M JORGE CONSULTORES ASSOCIADOS LTDA $10,000
NATL ASSC OF STATE DIRECTORS OF CAREER TECHNICAL EDUCATION NATL ASSC OF STATE DIRECTORS OF CAREER TECHNICAL EDUCATION undisclosed
BRAZILIAN AVOCADO COMMISSION FEDERAL STRATEGIES GROUP, INC. undisclosed
SAAGA FEDERAL STRATEGIES GROUP, INC. undisclosed
UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO undisclosed
THE GREAT PLAINS INSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, INC. KOUNTOUPES DENHAM CARR & REID, LLC undisclosed
CLOUDTRUCKS INVARIANT LLC undisclosed
LOS ANGELES CLEANTECH INCUBATOR INVARIANT LLC undisclosed
THE SCIENCE COALITION FORBES-TATE undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Maxine Waters, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us