H.J.Res. 179

H.J.Res. 179: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to “Consumer Financial Protection C

Introduced Maxine Waters (D) HOUSE_JOINT_RESOLUTION — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.J.Res. 179 is a resolution that seeks to disapprove a rule put forth by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (BCFP) that involves the withdrawal of a previous consumer financial protection regulation. Essentially, this resolution is an effort by Congress to reverse the BCFP's decision to eliminate a specific consumer protection rule.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.J.Res. 179 argue that disapproving the withdrawal of the consumer protection rule is essential for safeguarding consumers' rights and ensuring fair financial practices. They highlight the importance of maintaining strong oversight over financial institutions to protect vulnerable consumers from predatory practices.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.J.Res. 179 contend that the resolution undermines the BCFP’s ability to adapt regulations based on current economic conditions and consumer needs. They express concerns that reinstating the withdrawn rule could hinder financial innovation and limit access to credit for consumers, particularly those with lower incomes.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Finance and Financial Sector

The analysis of H.J.Res. 179, sponsored by Maxine Waters, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries. This suggests that the financial interests of her primary donors do not directly influence the legislation concerning the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection's rule withdrawal. While there is some lobbying activity in the policy area, the undisclosed nature of these activities makes it difficult to ascertain their direct impact on the bill. The only disclosed amount is $7,500 from SANA HEALTH, which does not appear to have a direct connection to consumer financial protection issues, indicating a low risk of conflict of interest.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
SANA HEALTH TERRAPIN STRATEGY, INC $7,500
VICTIMS OF TERRORISM - EAST AFRICA MR. RONALD COLEMAN undisclosed
VENUS AEROSPACE CORP. VENUS AEROSPACE CORP. undisclosed
GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY THE CORMAC GROUP, LLC undisclosed
SOIL CULTURE SOLUTIONS, LLC (D/B/A SOILCEA) CORCORAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. DBA CORCORAN PARTNERS undisclosed
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE undisclosed
NEBRASKA RURAL GENERATION LLC JABAL COMPANIES LLC undisclosed
RHOBACK, INC. ATLAS CROSSING LLC undisclosed
GLOBAL MOBILE SOFTWARE LLC TERRAPIN STRATEGY, INC undisclosed
SUMAIR VIRANI COZEN O'CONNOR PUBLIC STRATEGIES undisclosed
NATIONAL STRUCTURED SETTLEMENTS TRADE ASSOCIATION COZEN O'CONNOR PUBLIC STRATEGIES undisclosed
NUMERACLE, INC. ACG ADVOCACY undisclosed
AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR CAPITAL FORMATION AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR CAPITAL FORMATION undisclosed
HUBBARD HOUSE RESTAURANT, LLC COZEN O'CONNOR PUBLIC STRATEGIES undisclosed
INTUIT INC., AND ITS ENTERPRISE MEMBERS COZEN O'CONNOR PUBLIC STRATEGIES undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Maxine Waters, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us