H.R. 9514

H.R. 9514: To restrict the eligibility of mortgagors to citizens of the United States with respect to mortgage insurance provided by the Federal Housing Administration and the purchase and securitization of mortgages by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Introduced Brandon Gill (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9514 aims to limit mortgage insurance provided by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) and the purchasing and securitization of mortgages by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to only U.S. citizens. This means that non-citizens would not be eligible for these mortgage services.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9514 argue that the bill protects American citizens' access to housing finance and ensures that taxpayer-funded mortgage insurance is reserved for citizens, potentially strengthening the housing market for U.S. residents.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9514 contend that the bill could unfairly restrict access to homeownership for non-citizens, particularly immigrants who contribute to the economy. They argue that it may exacerbate housing inequalities and limit diversity in communities.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Finance and Financial Sector

The analysis of H.R. 9514, which seeks to restrict mortgage insurance eligibility to U.S. citizens, shows no direct industry overlaps with the sponsor Brandon Gill's top donor industries. The lobbying activity related to this bill primarily involves entities such as Occidental Petroleum Corporation and Ginkgo Bioworks, which do not have a direct stake in mortgage insurance or the operations of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The total lobbying amounts from these entities are significant, but they are not directly tied to the bill's subject matter, suggesting that there is minimal risk of conflict of interest. Voters should note that while there is lobbying activity, it does not appear to influence the bill's intent or the sponsor's motivations significantly.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
RESPOND-US CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $140,000
SILVERLINING ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC. $80,000
MEDLINE CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $80,000
GINKGO BIOWORKS, INC. CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $60,000
PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $50,000
LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES CAPITOL POINT GROUP, LLC $50,000
MERIDIAM INFRASTRUCTURE CAPITOL POINT GROUP, LLC $40,000
LEO TECHNOLOGIES BUTLER SNOW LLP $30,000
MAXIMUS BRICK STREET STRATEGY $30,000
JOHNSON & JOHNSON BRICK STREET STRATEGY $30,000
OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION GTB PARTNERS $20,000
CHAMBERS COUNTY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BUTLER SNOW LLP $15,000
HEARTH, PATIO & BARBECUE ASSOCIATION HEARTH, PATIO & BARBECUE ASSOCIATION $15,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF WEST ALABAMA BUTLER SNOW LLP $12,000
BASIS PATH BUTLER SNOW LLP undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Brandon Gill, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $240,000,000
Individuals: $240,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $75,000,000
Individuals: $75,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us