H.R. 9518

H.R. 9518: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow contributions to a health savings account when a spouse has a health flexible spending account.

Introduced Darin LaHood (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9518 aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code to permit individuals to contribute to their health savings accounts (HSAs) even if their spouse has a health flexible spending account (FSA). This change is intended to provide more flexibility for families in managing their healthcare expenses.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9518 have praised the bill for increasing financial options for families, allowing them to better save for medical expenses. The bill is seen as a step towards enhancing healthcare affordability and accessibility, particularly for families navigating different types of health accounts.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9518 argue that the bill could complicate the tax code further and create confusion for families about their healthcare savings options. Some detractors also express concern that it may disproportionately benefit higher-income households who can afford to contribute more to HSAs.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Taxation

While there are no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor's top donor industries and the subject matter of H.R. 9518, there is significant lobbying activity in related areas. Notably, RESPOND-US contributed $140,000, and MEDLINE contributed $80,000, both through CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. These entities may have interests in health-related policy, which could indirectly connect to the bill's focus on health savings accounts. However, the absence of direct donor industry overlaps suggests that the risk of a conflict of interest is moderate rather than high. Voters should be aware of these contributions as they may influence the legislative process, even if not directly tied to the bill's content.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
RESPOND-US CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $140,000
SILVERLINING ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC. $80,000
MEDLINE CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $80,000
GINKGO BIOWORKS, INC. CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $60,000
AMERICAN FLOOD COALITION ACTION INC ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC. $60,000
PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $50,000
LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES CAPITOL POINT GROUP, LLC $50,000
MERIDIAM INFRASTRUCTURE CAPITOL POINT GROUP, LLC $40,000
LEO TECHNOLOGIES BUTLER SNOW LLP $30,000
MAXIMUS BRICK STREET STRATEGY $30,000
JOHNSON & JOHNSON BRICK STREET STRATEGY $30,000
OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION GTB PARTNERS $20,000
CHAMBERS COUNTY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BUTLER SNOW LLP $15,000
HEARTH, PATIO & BARBECUE ASSOCIATION HEARTH, PATIO & BARBECUE ASSOCIATION $15,000
BASIS PATH BUTLER SNOW LLP undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Darin LaHood, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $80,000,000
Individuals: $80,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $25,000,000
Individuals: $25,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us