H.R. 9150

H.R. 9150: To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide coverage for boxing-based exercise classes for veterans diagnosed with certain movement disorders, and for other purposes.

Introduced Darin LaHood (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9150 is a bill that aims to amend the U.S. Code related to veterans' benefits. It directs the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to cover boxing-based exercise classes specifically for veterans who have been diagnosed with certain movement disorders. The bill seeks to enhance rehabilitation options for these veterans through physical activity.

Positive Media Summary

Media coverage has highlighted the potential benefits of boxing-based exercise for veterans, emphasizing its role in improving physical health, coordination, and mental well-being. Advocates have praised the bill as a progressive step towards providing innovative therapeutic options for veterans dealing with movement disorders.

Negative Media Summary

Some critics have expressed concerns regarding the allocation of funds for boxing classes, arguing that resources could be better spent on more comprehensive healthcare services or therapies. There are also worries about the safety of boxing as an exercise option for individuals with movement disorders.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Armed Forces and National Security

The analysis of H.R. 9150, sponsored by Darin LaHood, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries. The bill aims to provide coverage for boxing-based exercise classes for veterans with movement disorders, which does not appear to be influenced by the interests of LaHood's donors. Additionally, while there is significant lobbying activity in the policy area, the lack of disclosed financial connections between these lobbying entities and the bill suggests minimal risk of conflicts of interest. Voters should note that while lobbying exists, it does not directly correlate with the bill's intent or the sponsor's financial backers.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY RMP STRATEGIES, LLC $10,000
MANAGED FUNDS ASSOCIATION RMP STRATEGIES, LLC $10,000
PUBLIC PRIVATE STRATEGIES VALENTINE STRATEGIES undisclosed
SAMSARA INC. CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. undisclosed
OTG PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
BLOCKQUAKE HOLDINGS LLC PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
PAYSAFE MERCHANT SERVICES CORPORATION PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
PROOF OF STAKE ALLIANCE PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
SENTILINK CORP. PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
TEMPLUM LLC (FORMERLY KNOWN AS OUISA CAPITAL LLC) PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
GLOBAL PRIMEX LLC PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
WARRIOR TRADING PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
SYNIVERSE TECHNOLOGIES LLC PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
SOUTHERN INSTITUTE OF POLICY RESEARCH SOUTHERN INSTITUTE OF POLICY RESEARCH undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Darin LaHood, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us